If Animals Kissed Good Night PDF Free Download

If Animals Kissed Good Night PDF

Features of If Animals Kissed Good Night PDF

If Animals Kissed Good Night PDF-Don’t miss the other books in this adorable series: If Animals Said I Love You, If Animals Celebrated Christmas, If Animals Went to School, and If Animals Gave Thanks!

What if animals did what YOU do? This bestselling story imagines how animals would kiss their loved ones good night!

If animals kissed good night like we do…how would they do it? Giraffe and his calf would stretch their necks high, Wolf and his pup would kiss and then HOWL, and Sloth and her baby would move sooooo sloooowwwww. And across the animal kingdom, every creature would share love in a unique way.

Recommended Books For You

Essentials of Nursing Research Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice 10th Edition PDF Essentials of Nursing Research Appraising Evidence for Nursing Practice 10th Edition PDF Download Free

Gray’s Anatomy The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice PDF 41st Edition Free Download

Description of If Animals Kissed Good Night PDF

If Animals Kissed Good Night PDF is one of the best medical books for students and for children and parents. . It is a must download.

The Authors

If Animals Kissed Good Night PDF

ANN WHITFORD PAUL graduated from the University of Wisconsin and Columbia University School of Social Work. She became inspired to write picture books after years of bedtime reading to her four children. Now she gets story ideas from her seven grandchildren. She’s published over 25 award-winning picture books, (rhymed and prose-fiction and nonfiction) poetry, early readers, and a book for adults about how to write picture books. When she isn’t writing, she loves listening to her cat purr, watching spiders spin their webs, and following snails’ trails.

You can learn more about her, download writing tips and classroom activities, and contact her through her web-site: www.annwhitfordpaul.com. Sign up for my monthly posts, often written by my cat, Mr. Darcy with writing advice, book recommendations and more https://visitor.constantcontact.com/manage/optin?v=001nxNUBQroFr1JC4WHr71utq-yOB6YZBQoLVUY024phXn_2MwV3TlzR_TzhMK1nPtlWG_71Gj2iI_NQM5HLOOjjmm3LG7S31Xq7ezzV5IzA2HTT7cNRaELSw%3D%3D

Dimensions and Characteristics of If Animals Kissed Good Night PDF

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Farrar, Straus and Giroux (BYR); Illustrated edition (June 3, 2014)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Board book ‏ : ‎ 34 pages
  • International Standard Book Number-10 ‏ : ‎ 0374300216
  • International Standard Book Number-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0374300210
  • Reading age ‏ : ‎ 3 – 6 years
  • Lexile measure ‏ : ‎ AD600L
  • Grade level ‏ : ‎ Preschool – 1
  • Item Weight ‏ : ‎ 8.8 ounces
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 6.61 x 0.68 x 6.27 inches
  • Book Name : If Animals Kissed Good Night PDF

Download Link 1

Top reviews

Miss sue “I disagree with the adults who have negatively reviewed this adorable book. So that being said, I feel that the adults are not giving this book a fair shake. We, as adults, should remember that a touch (other than private parts, of course) or a kiss (consensual)) is something we as humans do to show how much we love each other. A mom, dad, brother, sister, grandparent, favorite doll, pet …is the recipient in a child’s heart. Not a stranger, criminal, pedophile. The longing of closeness exhibits cuddling and warmth. Some of the characters in this book, like seals, do not have lips like humans so a little silly twist is added to the story & illustration. The seals rub necks with each other…a sweet alternative like “eskimo kisses” (not sure if this term offends anyone. I apologize if it does) or maybe “butterfly kisses”. The author simply improvises to the delight of a child’s mind. So as much as it means or may not mean, this is my take on the book. Thank you for reading my thoughts.”

Arielle “I love this book. I bought it to add to my son’s library. The story is cute, the rhymes and rhythm of the book flow beautifully and the illustrations are gorgeous.

I am a bit disappointed with the durability of the book though. For being a “board book” it seems quite flimsy unlike my son’s other board books. So this will be a book I read to him, not one that I let him play with, which is a shame because he loves flipping through his books, pointing out the animals and looking at the pictures. He just isn’t very gentle with his books while doing so.

Update: So it turns out this is his favorite book and I couldn’t keep it from him. So the pages are bending, especially the back page. He spends a good deal of time (for under 1.5 years old) looking at this book and the illustrations. Plus he has me read it to him 4 or more times a day. I wish this book was as durable as some of his other books…”

MamaBear “Omg this book is SO freaking adorable. Read it in the library over the summer and had to buy it for our son.

The first page goes “If animals kissed like we kiss goodnight, sloth and her cub, in late afternoon’s light, would hang from a tree and start kissing….” Other pages: “tiger cub and mama would kiss and then growl… wolf and her cub would kiss and then howl”

The story is beautifully rhymed, the illustrations are great, and not too overwhelming or abstract like some baby books, and it has this adorable refrain every few pages of “and sloth and her cub? STILL kissing goodnight!” ahh! just so freaking cute. Probably my favorite baby book I’ve found this year, and I try to make it more engaging for our son (because it’s totally a mommy favorite) by lifting him upside down whenever they do the sloth refrain and giving him kisses, which he finds hilarious.

If this was helpful, please vote. Click on my username to view other baby product reviews!”

Mandrake “This was a book club choice, and one of the best that we have read in recent years. I would recommend it to everyone, but particularly those with strong and confirmed moral or political convictions. It will change your views about religion and politics, and hopefully make you more tolerant of other peoples perspectives. Here are my notes:

Haidt: The Righteous Mind
This was one of our best recent book club choices. It was well written, clear and thought provoking. The main point of the book to me was to demonstrate that morality has a social purpose, as the foundation on which social capital is constructed. What matters is that people share the same moral values, not whether those values are “right or wrong”. It has changed my thinking, and I have bought copies for friends of mine to see if it can also change theirs.


The book is divided into sections:
• Section 1: Intuitions come first, strategic reasoning second
The central metaphor is that the mind is like a rider on an elephant, whose job is to serve the elephant without much control of where the elephant is going. Traditionally Western philosophy separated the body and the mind, with the mind being the “ghost in the machine”, but according to Haidt the two are intimately connected. In fact morality is rooted in emotion and not in reason. We act first (the elephant moves), and justify our actions later (the rider).

• Section 2: There’s more to morality than harm and fairness
The central metaphor is like a tongue with six taste receptors. Morality has evolved to bind social groups together. Haidt identifies 6 different moral foundations, each of which has a role to play in addressing specific human behaviours:
Care/Harm: evolved for the protection and care of vulnerable offspring
Fairness/Cheating: evolved to encourage sharing and punish cheating
Loyalty/Betrayal: evolved to bind people together in social groups and to punish defectors
Authority/Subversion: evolved to bind people within a hierarchical social structure within the group
Sanctity/Degradation: evolved to protect health by avoiding unsafe foods and encouraging hygienic practises
Liberty/Oppression: evolved to balance the personal freedom and group loyalty

• Section 3: Morality binds and blinds
The central metaphor we are 90 percent bee and 10 percent chimp. We naturally tend to aggregate into large social groups bound by shared morals. In this context religion should not be seen as a parasitic meme, but as a social tool that binds people together into a cohesive and effective unit. Further, our political inclinations are a function of our individual sensitivities to each of the 6 moral foundations. Socialists are primarily driven by Care/Harm considerations for “social justice” and equality of outcomes. Conservatives are more concerned with maintaining social capital in an imperfect world where people cheat and exploit the system. Neither has a monopoly on righteousness, and each has their place in maintaining a balanced society.

I thought that this was an excellent book, grounded in science, which succeeds in its main argument that morality is an evolutionary adaptation whose purpose is to behind social groups together. I also very much enjoyed the description of how the field of moral psychology has developed over time. I have only a few points to discuss:

1. Religion as a meme
Haidt argues that the new Atheists are wrong in characterising Religion as a pernicious meme, and that instead it has a social purpose in binding people together into a cohesive whole. I think he overstates his case, and that his argument is not incompatible with that of the new atheists (Dawkins, Hitchens etc). Although the set of religions as a whole may well have a social purpose (religion has spontaneously evolved too often for it not to have some use), each individual religion can also be regarded as a meme that exploits humanity’s social needs to propagate itself. Thus when Haidt states that religions change over time to fit the needs of a changing society, the New Atheists would argue that the meme mutates and evolves with its host to ensure its continued propagation. It is merely a question of perspective.

2. Moral foundations of political views
Although, the conclusion of Haidt’s discussion of the moral foundations for Conservative and Liberal viewpoints is a refreshing call for tolerance, I thought that this was the weakest part of the book. His claim that political beliefs can be traced back to differing sensitivities to the 6 moral foundations mentioned above was justified by social surveys in which people were asked their political orientation and then asked to answer moral questionnaires. Conservatives and Liberals were then found to have different reactions to questions that targeted particular moral foundations. Correlation is not necessarily causation I thought that some of the graphs showed relatively weak relationships. In order for Haidt to be right the questions must be formulated so that the subject interprets them in the way intended, and that each question must target the intended moral foundation correctly. There is significant room for error and ambiguity there. His results seemed strong enough to draw general but not specific conclusions from.

3. I have an old friend whose politics are different from mine (he is a lifelong Socialist), so I bought him a copy of the book in the hope that it would provide some perspective and allow us to better understand each other’s viewpoints. As I handed it over he took one look and said “Not bloody Haidt, I hated that book.” We continue to avoid discussing politics. I am pessimistic that Haidt’s call for political toleration will be heeded.

I thought that this was a terrific book, and one of the best we have read in a while.”

Reference: Wikipedia

If Animals Kissed Good Night PDF

This site complies with DMCA Digital Copyright Laws. Please bear in mind that we do not own copyrights to this book/software. We’re sharing this with our audience ONLY for educational purposes and we highly encourage our visitors to purchase the original licensed software/Books. If someone with copyrights wants us to remove this software/Book, please contact us
. immediately.

You may send an email to emperor_hammad@yahoo.com for all DMCA / Removal Requests.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here